Posts Tagged Pakatan Rakyat


Must look into these 4 areas first:

1. Relevant Rules & regulations enforced during that material period.

2. Governance during that material period.

3. Who was/were vested with the authorities to conduct the trading?

4. National interest or pecuniary advantage?

Based on the above, the possibilities are as under:

1. Recommend criminal investigation

2. Recommend tighter housekeeping & internal surveillance.

3. NFA

It looks like it would be no. 2 + NFA or its equivalence.


28 June 2017.

, , , ,

Leave a comment

Bicara hangat sekarang ini

Re: bicara hangat sekarang ini.. untuk keinsafan diri

Dlm UMNO ada demokrasi.
Lalu kita semua ada hak bersuara tetapi bertanggungjawab & berakauntabiliti.

Pemimpin mendengar teguran, menimbang pandangan.

Berunding di dalam gelap
Berbincang di dalam terang
Mencapai kata muafakat
Ikhlas dan redha membawa berkat.

Orang bawahan pula
Pilih antara dua:

* bersuara atau berdiam.
* berpihak atau berkecuali.
* menjadi air atau menjadi minyak.

Namun tetap satu matlamat yg dikongsi bersama –
Parti terus kukuh kekal berkuasa selepas PRU14 dan selama-lamanya.

Justeru mencapai matlamat yang diidamkan
Yang condong ditongkatkan
Yang rebah ditegakkan.
Bukan sokong membawa rebah,
Luka menjadi tokah dan
Retak membawa belah.

Lantas mohon hentikanlah berbalah,
Berpeganglah kepada tali Allah.

Lantaran walau apapun perbezaan pendapat,
Yg jauh boleh ditarik dekat,
Yg dekat bertambah rapat,
Yg rapat semakin erat.
Antara tidor dan jaga kita melihat,
Tanpa sedar semua hati telah bertaut terpikat.

Ingatlah pesan nenek moyang..
Antan sama antan berlaga ayam yang kenyang.
Cat ting telinga tikus
Biar genting jangan putus.

Harapan dan doa suci kita:

Pohon bergoncang angin berhembus
Pokok semalu dicelah rumput
Air dicincang tak kan putus
Biduk lalu kiambang bertaut.



Leave a comment

Anwar Ibrahim and Yuktes Vijay : The End

“Nazri: IPU report ‘ridiculous, stupid, short-sighted” – The Malaysian Insider, October 23 2010

“Drop Anwar charges, Australian MPs tell Malaysia” – The Nation, February 12 2010

“The charges against Anwar Ibrahim for the offence of carnal intercourse against the order of nature, the criminal trial that followed and the strictures with respect to pre-trial disclosure, show us two things: it is high time such an offence is expunged from our statute books, and trial by ambush has no place in the criminal justice system. This book is a timely reminder that justice is a global concern”.
Christopher Leong
Vice-President, Malaysian Bar

“A contemporaneous and incisive account of a political trial disguised as a criminal case. A must-read”.
Anil Divan
Senior Advocate and President of the Bar Association of India

“Mark Trowell exposes sharply the flawed prosecution of Anwar Ibrahim – an absolute read for every one interested in understanding how and why this happened”.
Rogier  Huizenga
Head of Human Rights Programme
Inter-Parliamentary Union, Geneva

 “An eloquently analysed process of a case, which barely corroborates the judicial independence and the Rule of Law”.
Akio Harada
Former Prosecutor General of Japan

If you read the quotes above, it is blatantly clear that Anwar Ibrahim generates an overwhelming support from influential and powerful personalities and organizations. As stated above, those who show him the support include Head of Human Rights International Parliamentary Union and our own Malaysian Bar. To put it in simple terms, it is proven beyond reasonable doubt that Anwar Ibrahim is a victim of a Barisan Nasional conspiracy. And, Anwar is a reformist who is being punished for trying to change the country.

The opinions of those foreign personalities and bodies made the pro BN groups to question the ulterior motive of them. Some even described it as a way to make Christianity the official religion of Malaysia. The truth is the foreign bodies do not want to interfere in Malaysia or make enemies with the Islamic followers.

Barisan Nasional is not hated by international bodies without a reason. They were made to do so by Anwar Ibrahim.

Mark Trowell is an observer with the International Parliamentary Union. He writes reports that will be used or referred to by international countries and bodies. These reports of Mark Trowell will be used to see if indeed Anwar Ibrahim is innocent or it is a conspiracy. After reading the report, they will decide if Anwar is being bullied or if he is really guilty.

The problem is the reports that were submitted are Anwar friendly. It means the report was wrote in such a way that Anwar is made to look like a victim. Basically, the report was written to show Barisan Nasional is a bad government.

All this was possible because Mark Trowell was Anwar Ibrahim’s man. I don’t know if he was paid, given property or women. All that I know is when I was in the defence team, Mark Trowell too acted as one the lawyers of Anwar. You tell me how an observer can act as a defence lawyer. Does it make sense?

Attached below is a screenshot of Mark Trowell helping us to find points and give suggestions as to what to write in our submissions for Anwar’s trial. Yes, he does not correspond with any of our official e-mail. He only does it with Astroboy. Remember that name? (Attached as File 1)

Trowell 1

The research that was done by Mark Trowell in order to obtain documents from prosecution team. This research points of his were then used to be argued in Court. The argument was not accepted by the judge. It was then decided, after discussing with Mark Trowell of course, that we all should submit to recuse the judge ( recuse means remove the judge and replace with a new one).

Why we wanted to do it, and we did it 3 times, so that Mark Trowell can write in his report that the defence team was denied documents, so he was not given a fair trial and they even tried 3 times to recuse the judge. If you are the foreign body reading such a report, surely you will assume that Anwar is not been given a fair trial.

The other things that I have taken note that was omitted/not stated in his reports was

a)         the fact that Anwar and his lawyers lied that he has an alibi when applying for bail. For the record, not even one alibi witness was produced by the defence lawyers throughout the trial ;

b)         the fact that Anwar did not take stand was because he could not answer all the questions that was to be thrown by the Prosecution team. For an example, why was Saiful asked to deliver the documents personally and why Saiful was given such a special treatment by Anwar

c)         in the Sodomy 1 trial, Trowell stated that Azizan is not a trustable witness. He cannot be trusted because he did not do a Statutory Declaration on it. What Trowell did not tell UN or IPU is that Azizan did a Statutory Declaration but it is with Karpal Singh, Anwar’s lawyer in the trial currently.

The 3 facts stated is just a few other things that was omitted by Mark Trowell. In fact, there are a lot more to be listed. I have it all.

Many wonder how we won the trial. Check the e-mail below.

Trowell 4

The above e-mail shows that Mark Trowell telling us that Yusof is planning an appeal. The Yusof mentioned here is the public prosecutor, Datuk  Yusof. Mark Trowell and us are friends. Yusof and Trowell are friends. And immediately after Sodomy 2, Yusof joins the legal team of Anwar Ibrahim. Very very funny right?  Oh and Saiful’s lawyer was in fact a chambering student with Karpal Singh. Basically, everyone from the lawyers to the media and just about anyone in the Court were Anwar’s men.

This has got nothing to do with the fake MC evidence that I submitted to the Attorney Generals. This is a whole new issue. The next issue will be about Mat Zain, the former police chief who always bangs the Government and PM.

Remember, when I speak I produce evidence to back each and one of my claims. You can kill my credibility but not that of my evidence.

What I am trying to do is not put Anwar Ibrahim in jail or kill him politically. He is least of my concern or bother.

I want to clear the wrong impression that the reports by Mark Trowell have been given to foreign countries, international bodies and world leaders. It is wrong and false.

Tomorrow if Anwar dies, he becomes a reformist who was a victim of BN conspiracy. Is that the truth? Is that what Anwar really is? But sadly, that will be how history will remember Anwar. Why? Because the observer wrote a report which is not true.

I don’t know how many of you understand the implications. I do. And I will continue what I am doing.


1 Comment

Kes Anwar Ibrahim Tipu Mahkamah Guna Chegubard

Keterangan dari bekas peguam Anwar Ibrahim:

I refer to above matter.

2. Firstly, kindly allow myself to express my utter disappointment and dismay displayed by our respected law enforcers in handling and investigating my claims and allegations. I state this regretfully and with a tinge of sadness, as to be honest I expected hesitancy and culpability when reports are filed on Opposition Leaders.

3. Unfortunately, due to insistence and persuasion by the general public and my well wishers, I write this letter, not in hope of justice but in the name of respect and honour to the very same syllable mentioned above, JUSTICE.

4. My first claim is that a MC which was obtained with the very intention of cheating and deceiving the Respected Court. The said MC was submitted by Badrul Hisham Shahrin aka Chegubard (hereby referred to as “the accused”) on the behest of a certain Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim. The lawyers who conspired maliciously, intended fraud and pulled of the deceiving act were Sankara Nair and Datuk Yusof. The firm that handled the matter with regards to Chegubard was SN Nair & Partners.

5. Kindly refer to Appendix 1. It is a screenshot of an e-mail correspondence between Mr Ramkarpal and Sankara Nair. A clear indication of intent to represent Chegubard and discharge themselves as the lawyers of Anwar Ibrahim is apparent here. The date of this e-mail was on the 9th of July.

6. Kindly refer to Appendix 2. After the negotiation and settlements were done with the previous lawyers of the accused, Mr Sankara Nair had instructed me to correspond with Chegubard. I managed to contact him after various attempts and severe efforts by Mr Ibrahim Yaakob. The inability to contact the accused was due to political reasons ie conflict between the previous lawyers and Anwar Ibrahim. Although I managed to contact him previously, as stated and highlighted in the e-mail, on the 31st of July, the accused had gone missing, without informing or notifying the lawyers of his whereabouts.

7. Kindly refer to Appendix 3. The e-mail indicates the change of Court dates. In short, the trial was brought forward from the previous date of 7th of September 2012 to the 3rd of September. Also, it is important to note that the e-mail was received on the 16th of August 2012.

8. The sudden change of date was a fatal blow to the lawyers of the accused. A simple process of Change of Solicitors would not have given birth to any complications legally. However, as the intention was to hide the fact that the lawyers of the accused were in fact previously the lawyers of Anwar Ibrahim on the first day of the trial compromised further steps which are in line with the law.

9. Kindly refer to Appendix 4. After lengthy negotiations between Anwar and Datuk Yusof who furiously had stated that he wanted to leave the trial itself for being shown lack of respect, I was told by Sankara Nair to defuse the situation and send an e-mail to the accused. As instructed, I subsequently wrote an e-mail to the accused to obtain a MC from the 1st of September 2012 to the 4th of September 2012. And, the e-mail was sent on the 28th of August 2012. Such accurate medical prophecy by a team of lawyers.

10. Kindly refer to Appendix 5. The e-mail was sent by a disgruntled Sankara Nair on 30th of August. The lawyers of the accused were unable to reach him for reasons best known to him at that point of time. Subsequently, it is mentioned that a MC has to be submitted or all will be lost. What is meant by “all will be lost” would be further explained if the Attorney General decides to press charges. A blatant attempt to deceive the Court is apparent and crystal clear here. Why such slyness and mischief when it would be easier to file in a Notice of Change of Solicitor? Such venomous tyranny against the usual process of Court in the name of Anwar’s politics is proven undisputedly here.

11. Kindly refer to Appendix 6. The e-mail was sent by the accused to Mr Sankara Nair who subsequently forwarded the same to Datuk Yusof and myself, mentioned as Yuktes Vijay. He arrives from Indonesia on the 1st of September 2012 and states he will be “admitted” on Monday morning. Again, how would someone know their admittance in a hospital prior to any check up is to be seen.

12. The aforementioned events and evidences are not in anyways tampered or doctored. Any such excuse provided or offered is an attempt to dupe, con and deceive the Court.

13. On final note, the evidences have been provided and the events that transpired have been described. The “one and only step” which remains from the time I lodged a police report on the 17th of July 2013 till now is to head to the Court, check the submitted documents on the day of the trial as mentioned above on the 3rd of September 2012 and verify if a MC was submitted on behalf of the accused and as the e-mails suggest, on behest and for the benefit of Anwar Ibrahim.

14. If the aforementioned “one and only step” is a step too many for the Police and the evidences provided by myself is indeed too complicated to be deciphered , I apologize for testing their thinking and intelligence to the limit. If that is the case, God save our judiciary is my prayer.

Thank you.

Di bawah adalah print screen email antara pihak yang terbabit:

Appendix 1 Appendix 2 appendix 3 Appendix 4 Appendix 5 appendix 6


Leave a comment

PRU 13: Iltizam Kaum Cina Untuk Menegakkan Ketuanan Cina!

PRU ke 13 telah sebulan setengah berlalu. Keputusannya telah diketahui ramai: BN menang dengan majoriti mudah – 133 buah kerusi parlimen; merosot 7 kerusi tetapi berjaya merampas kembali Kedah; pembangkang pula menang 89 kerusi parlimen.

Banyak sebab telah diberikan berhubung kemerosotan itu; antaranya kesilapan memilih/meletakkan calon, kelemahan jentera dan sabotaj dari dalam parti. Apapun, sebab yang paling besar, seperti yang diungkapkan oleh YAB Dato’ Sri Najib ialah tsunami Cina!

Agar saya tidak disalah-tafsirkan sebagai rasis, maka sebelum saya menulis lebih lanjut lagi, eloklah saya tegaskan bahawa kaum Cina adalah pragmatis dan bijak menggunakan peluang keemasan yang ada.

Adalah tidak salah mereka BERSATU menggunakan hak demokrasi yang mereka miliki sebagai rakyat Malaysia. Justeru adalah juga tidak salah mereka BERSATU mahu memilih/memangkah mana-mana parti yang mereka suka.

Lantaran hakikatnya mereka secara sukarela dan demokratik telah mengundi keluar dari kerajaan Barisan Nasional (BN) dan memilih berpayung di bawah pembangkang. Yang demikian, mereka sewajarnyalah (deserve) TIDAK berhak mendapat apa-apa hak dan keistimewaan sebagai ahli sebuah parti yang menang.

Orang Melayu pula disebaliknya; kurang pragmatis dan kurang bijak serta TIDAK bersatu! Janganlah salahkan ibu mengandung.

Orang Cina telah melihat dan menyambar peluang serta tawaran yang diberikan oleh Dato’ Seri Anwar kepada kaum mereka. Anwar bukan sahaja bersedia memberikan peha, bahkan nampaknya sanggup menghadiahkan celah peha asalkan nafsu kemaruknya untuk menjadi Perdana Menteri tercapai.

Lantaran itu, pada hemat orang Cina, INI KALI LAH bagi kaum mereka untuk mencapai strategi jangka panjangnya yang ketiga: MEREBUT KUASA POLITIK. Dua strategi pertama telahpun berjaya – kerakyatan dan kuasa ekonomi.

Mereka telah menyeru supaya bersatu dalam menumbangkan kerajaan BN, sepertimana yang disiarkan dalam Nanyang Siang Pau pada 13 Jun 2009.

Ia boleh ditafsirkan sebagai prakrasa dan iltizam untuk menumbangkan kerajaan yang bertunjangkan Pribumi/Islam dan menggantikan dengan sebuah kerajaan yang berteraskan bukan Islam dan kaum minoriti Cina pula menjadi dominan ataupun, dalam lain-lain perkataan, ingin menegakkan ketuanan Cina.

Justeru PRU ke 13 telah mereka rancangkan sedemikian rupa dari peringkat persiapan menyerang, pertahanan, pemilihan dan peletakan calon dan sebagainya. Hasilnya, walaupun mereka tidak menang, tetapi komposisi calon-calon yang berjaya itu adalah manifestasi rancangan tersebut!

Natijahnya, di pihak pembangkang, bilangan MP Bukan Islam adalah jauh lebih ramai iaitu 50 orang atau 56% berbanding MP Islam hanyalah 30 orang atau 44%! MP Cina pula adalah seramai 39 orang atau hampir empat kali ganda lebih ramai jika dibandingkan dengan MP Cina dalam BN!

Dalam BN, terdapat seramai 97 MP Pribumi / Islam atau 73% dan 21 MP lagi Pribumi Bukan Islam atau 16%. MP Cina hanyalah 11 orang atau 8%!

Lantaran itu, adalah tidak salah jika dibuat kesimpulan bahawa orang Cina telah bersatu untuk menumbangkan kerajaan yang bertunjangkan Pribumi/Islam dan menggantikan dengan kerajaan yang bertunjangkan Bukan Islam/orang Cina!

Kerana laungan “INI KALI LAH” untuk mereka boleh merebut kuasa maka ahli-ahli MCA dan Gerakan dari kaum Cina telah menjadi pengkhianat parti dan berduyun-duyun lari bersekongkol dengan DAP. Lalu Tsunami Cina, sepertimana yang diungkapkan oleh Najib, adalah tepat sekali!

Tanpa sokongan padu Bumiputra di Sabah dan Sarawak, BN telah kalah pada tahun 2008 lagi!

Ada pendokong MCA mengingatkan orang UMNO bahawa orang Cina telah menyokong BN semasa PRU 1999. Tanpa sokongan mereka, mungkin BN kehilangan lagi banyak kerusi dalam PRU berkenaan. Setuju.

Tetapi mari kita tanya soalan ini: kalaulah orang Cina dihidangkan pada tahun 1999 itu peluang yang sama seperti tahun 2013, tidak mungkinkah orang Cina sudah merebut peluang tersebut dan menumbangkan BN pada tahun itu juga?

Melihat dan menilai sikap, pemikiran dan strategi orang Cina di Malaysia ini pada tahun 2008 dan 2013 maka jawapannya, tanpa melupakan tulisan pada tahun 2009 di atas dan malapetaka PRU 1969, tidak lain dan tidak bukan tentulah YA!

Dengan mengambil kira:

(a) sikap dan iltizam kaum Cina sedemikian rupa,
(b) kemasukan pemilih baru kira-kira 2.64 juta orang nanti,
(c) kawasan bandar akan semakin besar (dari 71% kepada 77%) kelak, dan
(d) penetrasi internet pula akan melebihi 75% nanti

apakah pelan tindakan BN/UMNO untuk kekal menang dengan selesa dalam PRU ke 14 nanti? Atau kaum minoriti Cina berjaya menegakkan pula ketuanannya di Malaysia ini.

Kalaulah iltizam orang Cina ini menjadi realiti maka Pribumi / orang Melayu hendaklah bersedia menghadapi malapetaka penghapusan mereka secara sistematik, sepertimana yang dilakukan oleh kerajaan Cina Singapura. Malapetaka tersebut telah diterangkan dengan jelas oleh Dr Lily Zubaidah. Layarilah bertajuk “Ketuanan Cauvinis”!



Artikel yang disiar di dalam Utusan Malaysia

Artikel yang disiar di dalam Utusan Malaysia

, , ,


Menjawab Sakmongkol

Ulasan saya thdp artikel SAKMONGKOL AK47: Metos Kejayaan UMNO – tidak diterbitkn. Maka saya ulas dalam blog saya.

Penulisan seperti itu perlu penelitian; jika tidak diteliti, tentu tertipu dgn fallacynya.

Seperti yang telah saya komen di post lain, saya ulangi di sini.

Isu pokok dia ialah kononnya UMNO TIDAK dpt sokongan popular, termasuk Mly bkn UMNO dgn bersandarkan undi 3.2 juta yg dikatakan diperolehi olh UMNO (Angka ini perlu disemak) dan ianya bersamaan jum ahli Umno.


1. Jum 3.2 juta undi yg Umno dpt itu (jika benar) adalah merujuk kpd 120 parlimen yg Umno bertanding (atau merujuk di 88 parlimen yg Umno menang?) sedangkn ahli Umno berselerak di 191 Bhgn/parlimen. Undi dari ahli Umno ini dia tak kira sbb Umno xbertanding di 71 parlimen lain (191 -120 = 71).

2. Sbhg drp 3.2 juta ahli Umno itu adalh bawah 21 thn tp x mendaftar (a) dan ada pula yang > 21 tahun tapi tak mendaftar maka xblh mengundi (b). Sbhgn lg sudah meninggal (c); ada juga yg xkeluar mengundi (d). % keluar mengundi = 84%. Maka jum ahli Umno yg keluar mengundi, secara kasar, ialah 3.2 juta – a – b – c -d = e.

3. (e) itu pula termasuklh bil.ahli Umno yg keluar mengundi di 71 kawasan parlimen yg Umno xbertanding.

4. Justru 3.2 juta undi yg diperolehi olh UMNO di 120 kawasan itu sudah tentulh merangkumi undi dari ahli Umno + bkn Umno! Sakmongkol jgn pretend BODOH!

5. Lalu Umno menjadi parti paling popular: UMNO = 25 %; Dap = 17 %; Pkr = 13 % & Pas = 9 %!

6. Ibupejabat UMNO blh berikn statistics sebenar.

Kes di Mlk jelas menunjukkan sokongan pengundi bukan Umno, terutama Mly, tetap kental sekalipun memang ada yg tercampak ke pembangkang:

1) Undi calon Umno dpt di 4 parlimen – 141, 612.
2) Pemilih Mly – 185, 959
3) Ahli UMNO – 97, 749.

Berdasarkan (a) 34% pemilih cina dan (b) <10% mereka mengundi BN/UMNO serta (c) 87% yang keluar mengundi maka sudah tentulah kira-kira 40% undi calon UMNO datangnya dari bukan ahli UMNO di empat-empat parlimen itu (M. Tanah, T. Batu, B. Katil & Jasin).

Sakmongkol, eloklah baiki kredibiliti tu; lebih-lebih lagi sudah bergelar YB. Apapun, TAHNIAH.


, , ,



Saya sering menulis isu-isu ekonomi dan kemiskinan; kadang-kadang saya menyentuh isu gejala sosial . Kali ini saya ingin menyentuh sepintas lalu satu aspek gejala sosial iaitu penyakit salah guna dadah.


Sesungguhnya penduduk Melaka Maju Negeriku Sayang, Negeri Bandar Teknologi Hijau amatlah bertuah dan wajar bersyukur kerana masalah salah guna dadah bukan saja rendah malah terus menurun di negeri ini. Pada tahun 2009, bilangan mereka adalah seramai 327 orang. Ianya telah dapat dikurangkan dengan ketara sebanyak 46% kepada 176 orang pada tahun 2010.

Dalam tempoh yang sama, bilangan penagih dadah di Pulau Pinang (3,753), Selangor (3,548), Kedah (2,507) dan Kelantan (2,360) bukan saja tertinggi di seluruh negara malah terus melonjak. Peratus lonjakannya adalah antara 24% hingga 90%!

Hampir tiga suku penagih ini adalah golongan belia (19 – 39 tahun). Mereka merupakan kumpulan yang aktif dari segi ekonomi dan reproduktif. Justeru kehilangan sumbangan daripada mereka merupakan satu kerugian besar kepada negara dan generasi akan datang. Lantaran itu, masalah ini perlulah ditangani bersama dengan berkesan, holistik dan segera.

Syukur kita kepada Allah swt dan terima kasih kepada YAB Datuk Seri Hj Mohd Ali Mohd Rustam (DAR) kerana beliau berjaya mengawal dan memerangi penyakit masyarakat tersebut di Melaka.

Beliau pula tentu gembira kerana dapat melihat sendiri hasil titik peluhnya itu. Gambar beliau berpeluk tubuh dan senyum itu merupakan manifestasi air muka seorang yang berjaya, confident dan berwawasan!

Sebagai rakyat yang tahu bersyukur dan berterima kasih, kita juga insaf terhadap saudara mara kita di negeri-negeri lain, terutama di empat buah negeri berkenaan. Marilah kita sama-sama bantu mereka di bawah semangat 1Malaysia.

Salah satu cara ialah kita mengalu-alukan kedatangan kesemua Menteri Besar/Ketua Menteri mereka untuk berbincang dan belajar dari DAR.

Cungkillah rahsia beliau menguruskan negeri ini sehingga berjaya dengan cemerlang; bukan saja berjaya dari segi ekonomi dan pembangunan prasarana serta bersih dan indah hingga diakui maju oleh OECD malah mampu mengatasi pelbagai penyakit sosial seperti pengangguran, kemiskinan dan salah guna dadah.

Jadikanlah Melaka sebagai contoh, model atau penanda aras!

Dalam pada itu, tiga pra syarat ini hendaklah terlebih dahulu dipenuhi sebelum memulakan prakarsa tersebut. Sesungguhnya inilah juga penyakit yang sebenar; bukan simptom.

Pertama, mengubati penyakit sindrom penafian. Pemimpin dan rakyat negeri-negeri berkenaan hendaklah mengakui dan menerima hakikat penyakit sosial kronik yang sedang mereka hidapi itu. Janganlah menafikannya, seoalah-olah semuanya sihat dan segar belaka.

Kedua, muasabah dan mengakuilah kelemahan / kesilapan sendiri. Yang demikian, barulah kelemahan / kesilapan itu boleh diperbetulkan.

Ketiga, buanglah jauh-jauh pendekatan mempertahankan pemimpin yang bersalah kerana ia mirip kepada sifat assabiyah yang merugikan. Sifat buruk inilah yang membuai pemimpin menjadi selesa sehingga membuat mereka terfikir yang mereka adalah maksum.

Setelah sedar betapa lemah dan teruknya pemimpin itu maka buatlah apa yang patut demi kebaikan masa depan bersama.

Jika tiga pra syarat ini dapat dipenuhi maka ruang pembaikan terbuka luas dan mudahlah kita menolong mereka. InsyaAllah.